Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 2022 Apr 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2241638

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medical devices can be reservoirs of multidrug-resistant bacteria that may be involved in the acquisition of infections since bacteria with the ability to form biofilms that are difficult to eradicate, mainly in mechanical ventilators. The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of O3 against biofilms of bacteria ESKAPE group through disinfection studies. METHODS: The formation of biofilms of ESKAPE group bacteria was induced in vitro. O3 was injected at different exposure times at a constant dose of 600 mg/h. The recovery of surviving bacteria after O3 treatment was assessed by bacterial counts and biofilm disruption was analyzed. Finally, the viability and integrity of biofilms after O3 treatment was determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). RESULTS: O3 showed bactericidal activity on biofilms from 12 min/7.68 ppm for A. baumannii and C. freundii. P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae and S. aureus were killed after 15 min/9.60 ppm. Correlation analyses showed inversely proportional relationships between the variables "disruption versus O3". CLSM revealed that death was time-dependent of biofilms upon O3 exposure. Orthogonal plane analysis showed that bacteria located in the outer region of the biofilms were the ones that initially suffered damage from O3 exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that this method could be an alternative for the disinfection in mechanical ventilators colonized by bacteria biofilm forming.

3.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol ; 2022: 6780575, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1816856

RESUMEN

Background: Evidence from across the world suggests that the pediatric population shows different clinical manifestations and has a lower risk of severe presentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to adults. However, Mexico has one of the highest mortality rates in the pediatric population due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therefore, our objective was to explore the epidemiological and clinical characteristics associated with a positive confirmatory test in the Mexican pediatric population admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Mexico City. Methods: Clinical, imaging and laboratory data were retrospectively collected from 121 children hospitalized during the period from March 4th, 2020, to August 8th, 2021. The patients were identified as suspicious cases according to the guidelines of the General Directorate of Epidemiology of Mexico. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests were used to confirm SARS-CoV-2 infection. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test, and propensity score matching was performed to determine univariate and multivariate odds ratios of the population regarding a positive vs. negative SARS-CoV-2 result. Results: Of the 121 children, 36 had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The main risk for SARS-CoV-2-associated pediatric hospitalization was contact with a family member with SARS-CoV-2. It was also found that fever and fatigue were statistically significantly associated with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test in multivariate models. Clinical and laboratory data in this Mexican hospitalized pediatric cohort differ from other reports worldwide; the mortality rate (1.6%) of the population studied was higher than that seen in reports from other countries. Conclusion: Our study found that fever and fatigue at hospital presentation as well as an antecedent exposure to a family member with SARS-CoV-2 infection were important risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 positivity in children at hospital admission.

4.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(12): 1474-1480, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1415168

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilators are essential biomedical devices for the respiratory support of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. These devices can be transmitters of bacterial pathogens. Therefore, it is necessary to implement effective disinfection procedures. The aim of this work was to show the impact of the modification of a cleaning and disinfection method of mechanical ventilators of patients with SARS-CoV-2 and ventilator-associated pneumonia. METHODS: A total of 338 mechanical ventilators of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and ESKAPE bacteria were divided in two groups. Group A and B were subjected to cleaning and disinfection with superoxidation solution-Cl/enzymatic detergent and isopropyl alcohol, respectively. Both groups were cultured for the detection of ESKAPE bacteria. The isolates were subjected to tests for identification, resistance, adherence, and genomic typing. RESULTS: Contamination rates of 21.6% (n = 36) were identified in group A. The inspiratory limb was the circuit involved in most cases of postdisinfection contamination. Acinetobacter baumanni, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and multi-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae were the pathogens involved in the contamination cases. The pathogens were highly adherent and in the case of A. baumanni, clonal dispersion was detected in 14 ventilators. Disinfection with enzymatic detergents allows a 100% reduction in contamination rates. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of cleaning and disinfection with enzymatic detergents/isopropyl alcohol of mechanical ventilators of patients with SARS-CoV-2 and ESKAPE bacteria had a positive impact on postdisinfection microbial contamination rates.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Desinfección , Humanos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Ventiladores Mecánicos
5.
Rev Alerg Mex ; 68(2): 112-116, 2021.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1395705

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe the most frequent dermatological conditions observed in COVID-19 patients and to determine whether their presence could be used to establish an early diagnosis or to predict the progression of the infection. METHODS: There was a review in PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE of all the articles that had been published between January 1st and November 1st, 2020, with the search terms focused on "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID-19" and "Skin diseases". RESULTS: Eighty three studies met the inclusion criteria. Skin lesions have been reported in 0.2 % of the patients. The most frequently reported dermatoses were: maculopapular/ morbilliform rashes, urticaria and angioedema, chilblain-like acral pattern, and vesicular lesions. Among researchers, there are differences of opinion about a possible diagnostic or prognostic value of the skin diseases that are associated to the infection. CONCLUSIONS: It is advisable to consider the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients who call the doctor for skin lesions, urticaria, or angioedema, with or without other symptoms of the infection, especially if there is a previous history of recent exposure to other infected subjects.


Objetivos: Describir las afecciones dermatológicas más frecuentes en los pacientes con la COVID-19 y precisar si su presencia puede ser utilizada para establecer un diagnóstico temprano o para predecir la evolución de la infección. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión en PubMed/MEDLINE y EMBASE de todos los artículos publicados entre enero 1 y noviembre 1 de 2020, con los términos de la búsqueda centrados en "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID-19" y "Enfermedades cutáneas". Resultados: Cumplieron los criterios de inclusión 83 estudios. Lesiones de la piel han sido reportadas en 0.2 % de los pacientes. Las erupciones maculopapulares/morbiliformes, la urticaria y el angioedema, el patrón acral parecido a sabañones y las lesiones vesiculares fueron las dermatosis más frecuentemente informadas. Existen diferencias de opinión entre los investigadores, acerca de un posible valor diagnóstico o pronóstico de las afecciones cutáneas asociadas con la infección. Conclusiones: Es recomendable considerar el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes que consultan por presentar lesiones cutáneas, urticaria o angioedema con o sin otros síntomas de la infección y en especial si existe algún antecedente de exposición reciente a otros sujetos infectados.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiología , Angioedema/etiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Urticaria/diagnóstico , Urticaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Urticaria/etiología
6.
World Allergy Organ J ; 13(11): 100476, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-844757

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In light of the current COVID-19 pandemic, during which the world is confronted with a new, highly contagious virus that suppresses innate immunity as one of its initial virulence mechanisms, thus escaping from first-line human defense mechanisms, enhancing innate immunity seems a good preventive strategy. METHODS: Without the intention to write an official systematic review, but more to give an overview of possible strategies, in this review article we discuss several interventions that might stimulate innate immunity and thus our defense against (viral) respiratory tract infections. Some of these interventions can also stimulate the adaptive T- and B-cell responses, but our main focus is on the innate part of immunity. We divide the reviewed interventions into: 1) lifestyle related (exercise, >7 h sleep, forest walking, meditation/mindfulness, vitamin supplementation); 2) Non-specific immune stimulants (letting fever advance, bacterial vaccines, probiotics, dialyzable leukocyte extract, pidotimod), and 3) specific vaccines with heterologous effect (BCG vaccine, mumps-measles-rubeola vaccine, etc). RESULTS: For each of these interventions we briefly comment on their definition, possible mechanisms and evidence of clinical efficacy or lack of it, especially focusing on respiratory tract infections, viral infections, and eventually a reduced mortality in severe respiratory infections in the intensive care unit. At the end, a summary table demonstrates the best trials supporting (or not) clinical evidence. CONCLUSION: Several interventions have some degree of evidence for enhancing the innate immune response and thus conveying possible benefit, but specific trials in COVID-19 should be conducted to support solid recommendations.

7.
Rev Alerg Mex ; 67(2): 199-201, 2020.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-745631
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA